HABITAT STATUS
 
  Canada is the steward of many types of wildlife and habitats. The country possesses diverse temperate grassland and forested, and arctic landscapes. As well, the nation has large oceanic territories and numerous freshwater areas. Wildlife and the habitats that sustain them are highly valued parts of our heritage, society and economy. Based on the varied interests and requirements (e.g. acts, legislations, commitments, regulations, policies, etc.) of governments, non-government organizations, industries, and individuals, it is prudent that periodic evaluations of the state of the country's habitat resources be undertaken.

These assessments provide a means to share information on:

  • the health and integrity of the habitat resources;
  • the stressors which may be adversely impacting them; and
  • new opportunities to improve the ways they can best be managed and conserved.

A Simple Relationship

Habitats and wildlife are very interdependent - without habitats, there can be no wildlife. Both natural and human modified habitats form the life support systems for all wildlife and without them, wildlife cannot survive - it's that simple. When the quality and quantity of habitats are jeopardized, so too are wildlife species.

Information is Critical

The use of, and access to, land and water resources in Canada and elsewhere are far more extensive than before. The northern forests, and arctic and oceanic regions are now much less inaccessible and remote. The southern regions of Canada continue to be subject to expanding urbanization and more intensive agricultural and forestry operations. The widening and intensification of human activities places many pressures on conserving productive and viable wildlife habitats. Better information is needed to answer important questions, such as:

  • How much habitat is enough?
  • What types of habitats are required for species for migration?
  • What are the critical places and time periods involved to protect wildlife species?
  • How can land and water use guidelines and processes be used to improve the conservation of wildlife habitats while recognizing other important socio-economic goals?

Having forums to discuss these types of questions and perspectives are vital starting points in information gathering. Access to up-to-date and authoritative information on wildlife and habitat resources and links to other important information on human activities, land/water uses, biodiversity guidelines, planning mechanisms, etc. are essential to address habitat concerns and issues.

The 2001 Wildlife Habitat Status Reports produced by Wildlife Habitat Canada (WHC) and its partners are examples of some broadly based and objective habitat assessments. The reports respond to many of the practical questions that conservationists, resource managers, farmers, fishers, land owners, etc. are asking about how to best meet current day conservation goals. However, Canadians are commonly drawing on information sources and data that were largely designed to meet earlier resource development goals. The habitat assessments and reviews do help to determine:

  • what are the critical types of habitat information that should be obtained?
  • how can governments/non-government organizations/industries, etc. be better engaged in habitat data collection and monitoring?
  • what can individuals through to corporations do to improve habitat decision-making, planning and management?
Similarly, WHC has helped to produce other status reports: The Status of Wetlands in Canada; The Status of Northern Protected Areas; Peatland and Wetland Protected Areas in Canada; and the Willougby Habitat Status Report. In addition, WHC has documented information on the status of Canadian peatlands on the Peat Portal.

New Approaches for Moving Forward

Partnerships are essential to both share/consolidate information, as well as develop new knowledge that will aid habitat conservation. The success of a Wildlife Habitat Information System will depend on:

  • a more integrated approach to management that engages the cooperation and talents of many government and non-government agencies; and
  • a well-structured process built around practical habitat approaches that includes:
    • conservation and biodiversity concepts;
    • evaluations of landscapes and seascapes;
    • objectives and indicators;
    • policies and performance measures;
    • inventories and monitoring systems;
    • conditions/indicators/stressors; and
    • reporting system.
  • a process to address habitat priorities and gaps.